|
|
It is heartening to observe Connecticut's vigorous interest translating into action with respect to expanding rail service which would embrace Springfield. Connecticut has had a long history of recognizing the importance of rail service. Perhaps, in part, because of its proximity to New York. To be sure Massachusetts could well learn much from Connecticut's "head of steam." A fundamental axiom in developing and/or accelerating the demand for rail service is to run trains where the people are. Along the inland route (i.e. the line between Boston, Framingham, Worcester, Springfield, Hartford, New Haven and on to New York), there is a base of 2.5 million more people than along the currently favored shoreline route. It is compelling, therefore, to urge that the federal government working with the Commonwealth restore and expand rail service along the inland route. Perhaps up to eight to 12 trains a day running each way. Alternatively steps could be taken to suggest that the "I" extend its rail service from Worcester to Springfield. That would enable many people who might not be able to afford the Boston housing market to move further west and still maintain their jobs in the metropolitan area. Correspondingly the market for commuter service to Eastern Massachusetts from Greater Springfield would immeasurably facilitate access to both employment and recreational activities in Boston. Further the restoration of rail service to Vermont along the Connecticut River line is welcome news.
Finally it is a given that trains are the most energy efficient means of transporting people. Therefore, it would seem to make sense that these objectives be not only recognized but implemented and soon.
James Dionne
West Springfield
|
Comments From Our Readers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
