So burning construction waste is 'green?'


By G. Michael Dobbs

Managing Editor



Now who I am to question Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles? I'm not an expert on the way a biomass plant can affect the air quality of a community. I'm not an expert on energy productions.

Nope, I'm just an old reporter who will be forced to breathe the air that will carry whatever chemicals the proposed Palmer Renewables plant on Page Boulevard in Springfield spews up.

By the way, before any of you dismiss this as just a "Springfield" problem, guess again. Winds will be carrying whatever is placed in the air by this plant all over the valley.

Bowles decided that enough due diligence had been done on the plant and waived having an environmental impact study completed for it this time last year.

The plant has just two more hurdles to clear before it will be a reality.

I don't understand why an environmental report was unnecessary because this plant will be the first one in the state at which construction waste will be burned to generate steam to make electricity.

Everyone with a fireplace or wood stove knows you're only supposed to burn clean, dry wood for the most efficient and safest heat. So what happens when you start burning scrap wood from old homes? Is it wet? Has it been painted, stained or treated somehow?

Yes, I know the proponents say the wood will be sorted and cleaned prior to tossing it in the fire. I'm just a little skeptical about the effectiveness of this process.

Why is the state even allowing this kind of enterprise? It's not "green." Instead of reducing an overall carbon footprint, we're now adding to it.

Think about it for a moment. If the state or the feds enacted provisions that made it easier for people to develop solar or wind applications I'd have a bank of solar panels on my roof if I could afford them or if the insulation of buildings to increase energy efficiency was required wouldn't that be better for all of us?

Those measures would put people to work and build a truly green energy infrastructure. I can't see how burning someone's trash is "green."

And when the parade of trucks carrying waste from around the Northeast hits Page Boulevard, we'll have not only an additional source of pollution, but also more traffic on an already busy street.

This is another misstep by the Patrick Administration.

***

It was a pleasure to sit with John Ratzenberger last week and hear him speak about what can be done to address the growing problem of a lack of skilled blue-collar workers in this country.

If you think a guy like Ratzenberger, who has made his fame and fortune primarily as a comic actor who was "on" during the interview, guess again. He was as serious as a heart attack and rightly so.

In this area we have some excellent vocational schools that offer programs that prepare students for entrance into the job market. These schools strengthen our local economy by providing a pool of skilled entry-level workers.

The problem is that for the last 30 or 40 years, there has been a constant emphasis that a college prep education is the preferable path for high school students. Too many people have viewed vocational education as something for kids who aren't "college material."

That is, of course, wrong on several different levels.

The reality is that many kids are shoved off to college who either shouldn't go to college or who should at least wait until they figure out what kind of college education is right for them.

This area has a very rich history of manufacturing and parents should work with local school officials to make sure kids have a very real choice for their future.

This column represents the opinions of its author. Send your comments to mdobbs@thereminder.com or to 280 N. Main St., E. Longmeadow, Mass. 01028.




Comments From Our Readers:

JanaChicoine

6/23/2009
10:06:31 AM
That animated graphic is just perfect. 'Governor Patrick, I'm just not getting why 'cough cough' this is clean? Can you explain it to me again, real slow...?' 
MoiraMurphy

6/23/2009
4:03:17 PM
Thank you for bringing this regional dilemma to our attention. This plant will effect the air quality regionally. The Pioneer Valley is already experiencing very poor air quality due to the fact that we live in a Valley and the prevailing winds bring in the air pollution from NYC, the Midwest coal plants, and the coal plant to the north of us.
This plant will directly impact all in the area. Environmental impact studies should be done and released to the public with the public being allowed to comment. Previous public comments were not allowed by non Springfield residents.
We need to protect our air quality and reduce our regional carbon footprint not increase it. This is not environmentally friendly, nothing about it is.
We need to all speak up before it is too late.

Save the air for our children.
 
gtrucks1

6/27/2009
7:23:22 AM
I find these Biomass Plants to be a threat to the environment and to our health. I thought we lived in a democracy? How can Springfield disallow non Springfield residents to comment on this plant which will have negative impacts to the valley and areas outside of Springfield? I agree fully with Moira - we need to speak up and be heard. Bring forward an environment impact study and make it available to the public.

Save the air for our children and protect the watershed.
 
 
 
Reminder Publications, Inc. 280 North Main St., East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • Tel: 413.525.6661 • Fax 413.525.5882

Web Design by
Home